USA Today quotes a classified report today (I wish just once they’d quote an unclassified report) regarding the failure rate of our nation’s airport security screeners. LAX screeners missed 75% of the fake bombs and bomb parts carried through by undercover personnel. O’Hare missed 60% or so. The brightest spot on the map for the screeners was San Francisco, where they only missed 20%.
San Fran, by the way, is not handled by the TSA. A private company does security there.
A TSA not-a-spokesperson said that San Fran did better because they get a lot of fakes there and are “more suspicious.”
Pardon me, but aren’t the screeners all supposed to be suspicious? Or at least vigilant?
This might seem a reach to some, but to me this is another fine example of what happens when the government becomes involved in things that are not within its constitutional mandate. Arguably, this might have something to do with securing “the blessings of liberty,” but the stats support the Libertatrian argument that government should stay the heck out of most things. Including airport security.
And now for something completely different.
The religious right has been flexing muscles lately, warning the GOP that they will bolt and vote independent if the party selects someone who isn’t kosher on the key issues (meaning abortion).
Hey, do what you want during the primary process…but once a nominee is chosen, ask yourself this: Who do I want sitting in that chair in the Oval Office? Would we be better off with someone who may not be “pure,” but at least identifies somewhat with the conservative half of the country, or is the “principle” more important than the damage Hilary would do?
Damage? Hilary? Well, let me explain what I mean. Here in Draughtlanta, we are looking at a period of a few months before our water supply reaches a point where the well has basically run dry. Literally. When Lake Lanier was completed in 1953, it took four years of regular rain to fill it to the brim, with the release gates completely closed. This body of water, which provides drinking water to a few million people, has a very small watershed (the water that feeds in and replenishes the lake).
So it is with our government’s funding. As taxes increase (as they must in order to keep up with any of Hilary’s bright ideas), the watershed gets smaller. We who represent the middle class are being squeezed, and a greater tax burden will push some of us right out of the category. The lake of funds that the government bathes in is a limited resource, and it springs only from the ability that you and I have to replenish it. As taxes rise, there are some who will no longer be able to do replenishment. They will then go from the category of “giver” to “receiver,” and the government cannot support the “receivers” it has now. Eventually, the lake will become a muddy hole in the ground surrounded by thirsty “receivers.”
Life can be hard. It is for me right now.
But it does not get better if the government takes care of you. If Big Brother is feeding you, he owns you. That ain’t what this country is about.